Pew Research Center for the People & the Press
Political Divide in Views of Campaign Coverage
Public Wants More Coverage on Issues, Less on Fundraising
At this early stage of the 2008 campaign, about half of the public believes that press coverage of the Democratic and Republican presidential candidates has been fair. But there are sizable partisan differences in evaluations of campaign coverage. Notably, a plurality of Republicans believes the press has gone too easy on Democratic candidates.
Fully 45% of Republicans say that the press has been too easy in the way it has covered Democratic presidential candidates, while 38% say that the coverage has been fair. By contrast, only about a quarter of Democrats (24%) say the press has gone too easy in covering GOP candidates; most Democrats (53%) believe the coverage of the opposition candidates has been fair.
A similar, though less dramatic, pattern is evident in partisans' views of press coverage of their own party's candidates. About half of Republicans (47%) say that coverage of GOP candidates has been fair, but a sizable minority (30%) believes it has been too tough. Democrats are more satisfied with coverage of the Democratic presidential field; 58% say it has been fair, compared with just 14% who say it has been too tough.
These findings are based on the most recent installment of the weekly News Interest Index, an ongoing project of the Pew Research Center for the People & the Press. The index, building on the Center's longstanding research into public attentiveness to major news stories, examines news interest as it relates to the news media's agenda. The weekly survey is conducted in conjunction with The Project for Excellence in Journalism's News Coverage Index, which monitors the news reported by major newspaper, television, radio and online news outlets on an ongoing basis.
The survey shows that Americans want more coverage of a number of aspects of the 2008 campaign, especially of the candidates' positions on the issues. Roughly three- quarters of the public (76%) say they would like to see more coverage of candidates' positions on the issues.
In addition to hearing more about policy issues, majorities want more coverage about the candidates' debates (57%), and their personal backgrounds and experiences (54%).
In a campaign in which there are unusually crowded fields in both parties – and with the press devoting most coverage to the frontrunners – 54% also say they want to hear more about "candidates who are not frontrunners."
The public shows less appetite for some other aspects of campaign coverage – notably, which candidate is ahead in the polls, and the candidates' fundraising efforts. Slightly more say they want less coverage about who is leading in the polls than say they want more coverage of this (46% vs. 42%). Fully 57% say they want less coverage of candidate fundraising, compared with just 36% who want to hear more about fundraising efforts.
Partisans Agree on Issue Coverage
Large majorities of independents (78%), Democrats (76%) and Republicans (73%) agree that they would like to see more press coverage of the candidates' stances on issues. Majorities of all three groups also want more coverage of debates, candidates' backgrounds, and the candidates who are not frontrunners.
However, Democrats (54%) are much more likely than Republicans (37%) or independents (38%) to say they would like to see more coverage of which candidate is ahead in the polls. And while there is fairly tepid interest across the political spectrum in coverage of candidate fundraising, 45% of Democrats say they want more coverage of the campaign money chase compared with 35% of independents and 25% of Republicans.