Numbers, Facts and Trends Shaping Your World

Decline of Christianity in the U.S. Has Slowed, May Have Leveled Off

Findings from the 2023-24 Religious Landscape Study

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Findings from the 2023-24 Religious Landscape Study

Illustration by Shawna X
How we did this

Pew Research Center conducts the Religious Landscape Study (RLS) to provide authoritative estimates of the U.S. population’s religious composition, beliefs and practices.

The new RLS was conducted in English and Spanish from July 17, 2023, to March 4, 2024, among a nationally representative sample of 36,908 respondents.

Our two previous Religious Landscape Studies, conducted in 2007 and 2014, were administered entirely by telephone. Because response rates to telephone surveys have dropped sharply over the past decade, we changed the design of the RLS in 2023-24.

To recruit people to take the survey, we used a method known as address-based sampling (ABS). This involved mailing invitation letters to randomly sampled addresses from the United States Postal Service’s Computerized Delivery Sequence File. This approach gave nearly all U.S. adults a chance of being selected to participate in the survey.

People who received our invitation had the option of completing the survey online, on paper, or by calling a toll-free number and completing the survey by telephone with an interviewer. In total, 25,250 respondents participated online, 10,733 completed the survey on paper, and 925 participated by phone.

The survey is designed to be representative of all 50 states and the District of Columbia. The study’s large size also makes it possible to describe the religious characteristics of 34 large metro areas

The data is weighted (using benchmarks from the U.S. Census Bureau and other sources) to be representative of the adult population of each state (and D.C.) and the overall U.S. adult population by gender, age, race, ethnicity, education and other categories. The survey’s margin of error for results based on the full sample is plus or minus 0.8 percentage points. The response rate is 20%.

For more details, refer to the Methodology.

Previous research has shown that people may answer some questions differently when completing a survey online or on paper than they do when speaking to a live interviewer over the phone. This means that when we compare data from the three landscape studies to see how Americans’ religious beliefs and practices have changed over time, we must consider the possible effects of changing the primary mode of interviewing from telephone (in 2007 and 2014) to online and on paper (in 2023-24). These “mode effects” can be quite large on some survey questions but small or nonexistent on others.

To help determine whether the results of particular questions in the new RLS are – or are not – directly comparable with our previous landscape studies, we conducted a nationwide telephone survey alongside the RLS. It included all the questions in the 2023-24 RLS that previously appeared in the 2007 and 2014 surveys. We used the findings of this experimental “bridge study” to inform the discussion of long-term trends throughout this report. For more details, go to Appendix A.

This report was made possible by The Pew Charitable Trusts, which received support from the Lilly Endowment Inc., Templeton Religion Trust, The Arthur Vining Davis Foundations and the M.J. Murdock Charitable Trust.

After many years of steady decline, the share of Americans who identify as Christians shows signs of leveling off – at least temporarily – at slightly above six-in-ten, according to a massive new Pew Research Center survey of 36,908 U.S. adults.

Line chart showing that after years of decline, the Christian share of the U.S. population stabilizes

The Religious Landscape Study (RLS) is the largest single survey the Center conducts, aiming to provide authoritative figures on the size of U.S. religious groups because the U.S. census does not collect that information.

We have conducted three of these landscape surveys over the past 17 years, with more than 35,000 randomly sampled respondents each time. That’s enough to paint a statistical portrait of religion not only nationally, but also in all 50 states and the District of Columbia, as well as in 34 large metro areas.

This introductory essay walks through the big-picture trends: evidence both of a long-term decline in American religion and of relative stability in the last few years, since 2020 or so.

Jump to an executive summary of key findings.

Search for data on religious groups.

The first RLS, fielded in 2007, found that 78% of U.S. adults identified as Christians of one sort or another. That number ticked steadily downward in our smaller surveys each year and was pegged at 71% in the second RLS, conducted in 2014.

The latest RLS, fielded over seven months in 2023-24, finds that 62% of U.S. adults identify as Christians. That is a decline of 9 percentage points since 2014 and a 16-point drop since 2007.

But for the last five years, between 2019 and 2024, the Christian share of the adult population has been relatively stable, hovering between 60% and 64%. The 62% figure in the new Religious Landscape Study is smack in the middle of that recent range.

The largest subgroups of Christians in the United States are Protestants – now 40% of U.S. adults – and Catholics, now 19%. People who identify with all other Christian groups (including the Greek and Russian Orthodox Churches, the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, Jehovah’s Witnesses and many others) total about 3% of U.S. adults.

Both Protestant and Catholic numbers are down significantly since 2007, though the Protestant share of the population has remained fairly level since 2019 and the Catholic share has been stable since 2014, with only small fluctuations in our annual surveys.

Meanwhile, the share of Americans who identify with a religion other than Christianity has been trending upward, though it is still in single digits.

Table showing 7% of U.S. adults now identify with a religion other than Christianity

Today, 1.7% of U.S. adults say they are Jewish when asked about their religion, while 1.2% of respondents in the new survey are Muslim, 1.1% are Buddhist, and 0.9% are Hindu.

Religiously unaffiliated adults – those who identify as atheists, agnostics or as “nothing in particular” when asked about their religion – account for 29% of the population in the new RLS. The size of the religiously unaffiliated population, which we sometimes call religious “nones,” has plateaued in recent years after a long period of sustained growth.

Rates of prayer, attendance at religious services also relatively stable

Other standard survey measures contribute to this emerging picture of stability:

  • Though down significantly since 2007, the share of Americans who say they pray daily has consistently held between 44% and 46% since 2021. In the new RLS, 44% say they pray at least once a day.
  • Similarly, since 2020, the percentage of U.S. adults who say they attend religious services monthly has hovered in the low 30s. In the new RLS, 33% say they go to religious services at least once a month.

Spiritual beliefs are widespread

Moreover, the survey shows that large majorities of Americans have a spiritual or supernatural outlook on the world.

For example:

  • 86% believe people have a soul or spirit in addition to their physical body.
  • 83% believe in God or a universal spirit.
  • 79% believe there is something spiritual beyond the natural world, even if we can’t see it.
  • 70% believe in an afterlife (heaven, hell or both).
Bar chart showing large majorities of U.S. adults believe in the existence of a soul, something spiritual beyond the natural world

But, despite these signs of recent stabilization and abiding spirituality, other indicators suggest we may see further declines in the American religious landscape in future years.

Namely, younger Americans remain far less religious than older adults.

For example, the youngest adults in the survey (ages 18 to 24) are less likely than today’s oldest adults (ages 74 and older) to:

  • Identify as Christian (46% vs. 80%)
  • Pray daily (27% vs. 58%)
  • Say they attend religious services at least monthly (25% vs. 49%)
Bar chart showing big age gaps in shares of Americans who identify as Christian, pray regularly

And the youngest adults are more likely than the oldest Americans to be religiously unaffiliated (43% vs. 13%).

Also, younger Americans are less likely than older adults to say they were raised in religious households.1 And, compared with older adults, fewer young people who were raised in religious households have remained religious after reaching adulthood.

These are among the key findings of Pew Research Center’s 2023-24 Religious Landscape Study. Like the previous studies, the new survey offers a great deal of information on what Americans believe and how they practice a wide variety of religions.

In this report, we cover in detail:

Reasons for the long-term decline and recent stability

The RLS and other recent Pew Research Center surveys suggest that two things are happening simultaneously in American religion:

  • Over the long term (since 2007 in our data and going back further in other major surveys), there is a downward trend in several measures of religiousness, including affiliation with Christianity.
  • In the short term (the last four or five years), these changes have slowed or perhaps even plateaued.
Long-term decline

One driver of the long-term trend is “generational replacement.” Older, highly religious, heavily Christian generations are passing away. The younger generations succeeding them are much less religious, with smaller percentages of Christians and more “nones.”2

In addition, the landscape surveys show that between 2007 and 2023-24, each birth cohort has become less religious, by several measures, as it has aged.

What’s a birth cohort?

Throughout this report, we use “birth cohort” to refer to a group of people who were born in the same years. We categorize U.S. adults into seven cohorts: people born in the 1940s (or earlier) and those born in the 1950s, the 1960s, the 1970s, the 1980s, the 1990s, and from 2000 through 2006.

One advantage of analyzing these cohorts rather than conventional “generations” (like the Silent Generation, Baby Boomers, Gen X, Millennials and Gen Z) is that most of the cohorts are of equal length (a decade long).

Another advantage is that the decade-long cohorts may not carry as many assumptions – or stereotypes – as the familiar generations do.

For example, people within the oldest and youngest cohorts, as well as those in between, have become less likely to say they pray daily, less likely to identify with a religion (including Christianity), and less likely to believe in God or a universal spirit with absolute certainty.

Line chart showing that as they have grown older, U.S. adults in all birth cohorts have become less likely to pray daily and less likely to identify as Christian
Recent stability

Since 2020, however, our surveys indicate that the religiousness of most birth cohorts has remained relatively stable. For instance, people born in the 1950s are about as likely to report praying daily in the 2023-24 RLS (53%) and the 2024 National Public Opinion Reference Survey, or NPORS (57%), as they were in the 2020 NPORS (55%).

Additionally, the new RLS finds that the youngest cohort of adults is no less religious than the second-youngest cohort in a variety of ways.3 Americans born in 2000 through 2006 (those ages 18 to 24 in the 2023-24 RLS) are just as likely as those born in the 1990s (now ages 24 to 34) to identify as Christians, to say religion is very important in their lives, and to report that they attend religious services at least monthly.4

Time will tell whether the recent stability in measures of religious commitment is the beginning of a lasting shift in America’s religious trajectory. But it is inevitable that older generations will decline in size as their members gradually die. We also know that the younger cohorts succeeding them are much less religious.

This means that, for lasting stability to take hold in the U.S. religious landscape, something would need to change. For example, today’s young adults would have to become more religious as they age, or new generations of adults who are more religious than their parents would have to emerge.

Line chart showing that since 2020, signs of religious stability across birth cohorts in the United States

Religion and spirituality among young adults

The dynamics of religion and spirituality among young people are key to understanding the country’s recent religious trajectory. The large size of the new survey makes it possible to paint a religious and spiritual profile of the nation’s youngest adults with unique precision.

By a number of traditional measures, today’s young adults exhibit far lower levels of religiousness than older adults. For example, 27% of adults between the approximate ages of 18 and 24 in the new survey say they pray daily, as do 31% of those ages 24 to 34. But among adults ages 54 and older, half or more say they pray daily.

Young adults also report attending religious services less often than older adults do, and they express lower levels of belief in God or a universal spirit. Compared with older adults, fewer young people identify as Christians, and more say they don’t identify with any religion.

Bar chart showing that in the U.S., young adults are far less traditionally religious than older adults

On the survey’s questions touching on matters of spirituality, however, the age gaps are smaller.

For example, eight-in-ten or more adults in all age categories say they believe people have a soul or spirit in addition to their physical bodies.

Bar chart showing that on measures of spirituality, gaps between younger and older Americans are relatively modest

And about seven-in-ten adults ages 18 to 24 and 75% of those ages 24 to 34 believe there is something spiritual beyond the natural world, only modestly below the 81% of the oldest adults (ages 74 and older) who say this.

In the rest of this Overview, we explore these and other key topics in detail:

In the new Religious Landscape Study, 62% of U.S. adults describe themselves as Christians. The Christian share of the population is now 9 points lower than when the landscape study was last conducted in 2014, and 16 points lower than in 2007.

Line chart showing the share of U.S. adults identifying as Christian is down since 2007, but it has held steady in recent years

The share of Americans who say they have no religion – identifying, instead, as atheist, agnostic or as “nothing in particular” – stands at 29% in the new RLS, up from 23% in 2014 and 16% in 2007.

The long-term decline in the Christian share of the population and growth of religious “nones” is demographically broad-based. There are fewer Christians and more “nones” among men and women; people in every racial and ethnic category; college graduates and those with less education; and residents of all major regions of the country.

But the changes are much more pronounced among ideological liberals than conservatives. Today, 37% of self-described liberals identify with Christianity, down from 62% in 2007, a 25-point decline. Meanwhile, 51% of liberals now say they have no religion, up from 27% in 2007, a 24-point increase. There are now more religious “nones” than Christians among liberals, a reversal since 2007.5

There also are fewer Christians and more “nones” among conservatives. But the changes in the religious composition of conservatives have been much less pronounced than among liberals, and a large majority of conservatives continue to identify with Christianity.6

These changes within ideological categories resemble long-term trends within political parties. A prior Pew Research Center analysis shows that both Republicans and Democrats include fewer Christians and more religious “nones” today than they did a decade or more ago. But the decline of Christianity and rise of religious “nones” has been much more pronounced among Democrats than Republicans.7

For a detailed discussion of trends in the religious composition of demographic groups, refer to Chapter 1.

Table showing long-term decline in Christianity is much more pronounced among political liberals than conservatives

In the 2023-24 RLS, about four-in-ten U.S. adults identify as Protestants. That is 11 points lower than in the 2007 RLS.

Line chart showing the long-term trends of religious identification within Christianity

All three major Protestant traditions have seen their population shares tick downward at least slightly over that period:

  • Evangelical Protestants now account for 23% of all U.S. adults, down from 26% in 2007.
  • Mainline Protestants stand at 11%, down from 18% in 2007.
  • Members of historically Black Protestant churches make up 5% of U.S. adults, down slightly from 7% in 2007.

Like the overall Christian share of the population, however, the total Protestant share of the population has been quite stable in recent years, hovering between 40% and 42% since 2019.

The Catholic share of the population has been steady over an even longer period. In 11 Pew Research Center surveys conducted since 2014, all but one have found between 19% and 21% of respondents identifying as Catholic.

Members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (widely known as Mormons) account for 2% of respondents in the new RLS, which is virtually unchanged from both the 2007 and 2014 landscape surveys. Orthodox Christians make up 1% of the U.S. population. Jehovah’s Witnesses and other, smaller Christian groups round out the country’s Christian population.

A closer look at Protestant denominational families

Many Protestant denominational families are slightly smaller today than they were in 2014 – at least nominally, even if some of the changes are too small to be statistically significant.

Table showing trends in size of Protestant denominational families

One exception to this pattern is nondenominational Protestantism. The share of Americans identifying with this group is slightly higher today than it was in 2014 (7.1% vs. 6.2%).8

Baptists continue to be the single largest Protestant denominational family in America. Today, 12% of U.S. adults are Baptists, down from 15% in 2014 and 17% in 2007.

Members of Pentecostal churches account for 4% of the U.S. adult population.

Methodists and Lutherans each make up 3% of the population, while 2% of U.S. adults identify as Presbyterians.

Detailed information about Protestant denominations is not available from Pew Research Center’s annual NPORS, making it difficult to know whether the size of denominations has stabilized in recent years.

Categorizing Protestants into one of three traditions based on their denomination

One unique feature of the Religious Landscape Study (RLS) is its detailed questions about religious affiliation. All respondents are asked an initial question about their religious identity (“Are you Protestant, Catholic … Jewish, Muslim, etc.?”).

Then, Protestants are asked a second question to get more information about what type of church they identify with (“Are you Baptist, Methodist, Lutheran, etc.?”).

Finally, depending on how they answer that second question, Protestants are asked a third question to try to determine which denomination they identify with. (Complete details on how these branching questions work and the exact wording of these questions are available in the questionnaires. Refer to the English paper questionnaire; Spanish paper questionnaire; and combined English/Spanish questionnaire for the web/phone administration.)

Pew Research Center researchers then take the most specific information respondents provide about their denominational identity and use it to group Protestants into one of three major traditions – the evangelical Protestant tradition, mainline Protestant tradition, or the historically Black Protestant tradition. These divisions within Protestantism are important, because each tradition has its own, distinctive set of beliefs, practices and histories.

For example, churches in the evangelical tradition tend to share the conviction that personal acceptance of Jesus is the only way to salvation; to emphasize bringing other people to the faith; and to have originated in separatist movements against established religious institutions. Churches in the mainline tradition, by comparison, tend to take a less exclusive view of salvation and to place more emphasis on social reform. Churches in the historically Black Protestant tradition have been shaped uniquely by the experiences of slavery and segregation, which put their religious beliefs and practices in a special context.

It’s important to note that not all Protestant respondents identify with a specific denomination. Many Protestants identify as “just Baptist” or “just Methodist,” say they don’t identify with any particular denomination, or describe themselves as “just Christian.” In these cases, respondents are categorized into one of the three Protestant traditions based on their answers to a question asking whether they think of themselves as born-again or evangelical Christians, and/or a question asking about their race. Protestants who do identify with a specific denomination are grouped into one of the three Protestant traditions based exclusively on their denominational affiliation.

For example, all Southern Baptists are coded as evangelical Protestants regardless of their race, and all United Methodists are coded as mainline Protestants regardless of their answer to the question about whether they think of themselves as a born-again or evangelical Christian. Complete details on the categorization of Protestantism are available in Appendix B.

The Southern Baptist Convention (SBC) – which Pew Research Center categorizes as part of the evangelical Protestant tradition – remains the nation’s single largest Protestant denomination. Today, 4.4% of U.S. adults say they identify with the SBC, down from 5.3% in 2014 and 6.7% in 2007.

Some of the other large evangelical denominational groupings include:

  • The Assemblies of God, which we classify as a Pentecostal church (1.1% of U.S. adults)
  • The Lutheran Church-Missouri Synod (1.1%)
  • Churches of Christ (1.1%)9
  • The Presbyterian Church in America (0.5%)

The United Methodist Church – a mainline Protestant denomination in the Center’s coding – makes up 2.7% of the U.S. population, compared with 3.6% in 2014 and 5.1% in 2007. The United Methodist Church has splintered in recent years, and many of its former churches have “joined the more conservative Global Methodist Church,” according to The Associated Press.10

Other large mainline denominations include:

  • The Evangelical Lutheran Church in America, or ELCA (1.4% of U.S. adults)
  • The American Baptist Churches USA (1.0%)
  • The Episcopal Church (0.9%)
  • The Presbyterian Church (USA), at 0.8%

The National Baptist Convention, USA – a denomination in the historically Black Protestant tradition – was named by 1.0% of survey respondents. Other large historically Black Protestant denominations in the survey include:

  • The Church of God in Christ (COGIC), a Pentecostal denomination mentioned by 0.7% of respondents
  • The National Baptist Convention of America (0.4%)
  • The Progressive National Baptist Convention (mentioned by fewer than 0.3% of respondents)
  • The African Methodist Episcopal Church (also mentioned by fewer than 0.3% of respondents)
Table showing a look at the largest Protestant denominations in the 2023-24 RLS

Identifying with religions other than Christianity

The share of Americans who identify with a religion other than Christianity has been trending upward, from 4.7% in 2007 to 7.1% today.

Table showing 1.7% of U.S. adults identify religiously as Jewish; Muslims, Buddhists and Hindus each make up roughly 1% of Americans

Overall, 1.7% of adults identify as Jewish when asked about their religion – on par with results from the previous landscape studies and Pew Research Center’s 2020 survey of Jewish Americans.

Muslims, Buddhists and Hindus each account for roughly 1% of the U.S. adult population. All three of these groups are larger today than they were in 2007.

An additional 0.3% of respondents identify with other world religions (including Bahai’ism, Daoism, Rastafarianism, Sikhism and traditional African religions).

And 1.9% of U.S. adults identify religiously as something else, including 1.1% of respondents who identify with Unitarianism or other liberal faiths, and 0.7% who identify with New Age groups.11

Religious affiliation of U.S. immigrants

About 14% of U.S. adults who were born outside the country identify with religions other than Christianity, including 4% of U.S. immigrants who are Muslim, 4% who are Hindu, and 3% who are Buddhists.12

Most immigrants to the U.S. who were born in other parts of the Americas are Christian (72%), including 45% who are Catholic. Among immigrants from Europe, 57% are Christian, 8% identify with other religions, and 34% are religiously unaffiliated.

Immigrants born in the Asia-Pacific region are divided about evenly between Christians, adherents of non-Christian religions (including 14% who are Hindu, 11% who are Buddhist and 7% who are Muslim), and the religiously unaffiliated.13

The survey did not include enough respondents born in the Middle East-North Africa or sub-Saharan Africa regions to be able to report on them separately.

Among respondents who were born in the U.S. but had at least one parent born outside the U.S. (i.e., second-generation Americans), 10% identify with religions other than Christianity.

By comparison, among people born in the U.S. to parents both of whom also were born in the U.S. (i.e., at least third-generation Americans), 5% identify with non-Christian religions.

Table showing that among U.S. immigrants, 58% are Christian and 14% identify with other religions

More broadly, the survey finds that the long-term decline in Christianity and growth of the religiously unaffiliated population is evident among immigrants, second-generation respondents (people who were born in the U.S. but had at least one parent born elsewhere), and people whose families have been in the U.S. for three generations or more.

For example, among respondents born outside the U.S., the Christian share of the population declined from 75% to 58% between 2007 and 2023-24. Over the same period, the religiously unaffiliated share of this group (immigrants to the U.S.) grew from 16% to 26%, and the share identifying with religions other than Christianity grew from 8% to 14%.

For more details on trends in the religious composition of U.S. adults, refer to Chapter 1.

Table showing the long-term decline in Christianity, growth of religiously unaffiliated is evident among both U.S.-born adults and immigrants

Race in religious groups and congregations

Like the U.S. public as a whole, both Christians and religious “nones” have experienced a decline in the shares who are White.

Among Christians in the new survey, 61% are White (and non-Hispanic), 18% are Hispanic, 13% are non-Hispanic Black, 4% describe themselves as multiracial or in another way, and 3% are non-Hispanic Asian.

In 2007, by comparison, 70% of Christians said they were White, 13% were Hispanic, 12% were Black, 3% identified as multiracial or in another way, and 1% were Asian.

Line charts showing the trends in the racial composition of U.S. Christians, religiously unaffiliated adults

In the new survey, 92% of respondents in the historically Black Protestant tradition are Black themselves, while 4% are Hispanic and 3% are White.

In most other Christian traditions large enough to be analyzed in the survey, seven-in-ten or more adherents are White. Catholics are an exception: 54% in the new survey are White, while 36% are Hispanic, 4% are Asian, and 2% are Black.

Table showing the racial composition of religious groups in the U.S.

Nine-in-ten Jewish respondents in the new survey are White. Among Hindu respondents, 84% are Asian, as are 56% of Buddhists in the survey.

Muslim respondents in the new study include 30% who are White, 30% who are Asian, 20% who are Black and 11% who are Hispanic.

Roughly three-quarters of atheists (75%) and agnostics (74%) in the new survey are White; fewer people who describe their religion as “nothing in particular” are White (57%).

(For a detailed discussion of the racial and ethnic composition of religious groups, refer to Chapter 24.)

The survey asked people who attend religious services at least a few times a year about the racial and ethnic makeup of the congregation they attend. And it asked a similar question about the racial and ethnic composition of the congregation that respondents attended as children.

Among people who attend religious services, roughly one-third currently attend a congregation where they, themselves, are not part of a racial or ethnic majority. This includes 11% who say that most of their fellow worshippers have a different race or ethnicity than they do and 21% who say that no one racial or ethnic group makes up a majority.

Fewer people (roughly one-fifth of respondents) say they grew up attending a congregation where they, themselves, weren’t in a racial or ethnic majority. This includes 10% who grew up going to religious services at least a few times a year at a house of worship where most people belonged to a different race or ethnicity than they did, and an additional 10% who say that no single racial or ethnic group predominated at those services.

For more on race in religious congregations, refer to Chapter 9.

Table showing the racial composition in U.S. congregations

The narrowing gender gap in American religion

Recent news accounts suggest that among the youngest Americans, men are more religious than women. This would be a major reversal from the past. Historically, U.S. women consistently have exhibited higher levels of religiousness (on average) than men.14

In the new RLS, women continue to report higher levels of religious affiliation, belief and practice than men do. At the same time, there are signs that the gender gap in religion is narrowing, as it is smaller among younger people than among older Americans.

Chart showing the gender gap in U.S. religion shows signs of narrowing

For example, in 2007, the share of women who said they pray every day exceeded the share of men who did so by 17 percentage points. In the new survey, women still report praying at higher rates than men. But the difference is slightly narrower, at 13 points.

Among the oldest adults in the new survey (ages 74 and older), the share of women who say they pray every day is 20 points higher than among men. By contrast, among the youngest adults (ages 18 to 24), the share of women who say they pray daily (30%) is similar to the share of men who say they do the same (26%); the 4-point gap is not statistically significant.

While the gender gap in American religion appears to be narrowing, there are still no birth cohorts in which men are significantly more religious than women. In every age group, women are at least as religious as men, and in many birth cohorts, women are significantly more religious than men.

Table showing that on some key religion measures, the gender gap is smaller among younger adults than among older people

Religion in childhood and adulthood

The survey shows that Americans’ current religious identities, beliefs and practices are strongly linked with their upbringing. People who say they were raised in religious homes are much more likely to be religious as adults.

More than half of people who say religion was very important in their families while they were growing up also say religion is very important to them today. By contrast, among people who say religion was not too important or not at all important to their families during childhood, just 17% say religion is very important to them today.

The survey finds a similar pattern on questions about religious attendance. People who grew up attending religious services regularly (at least once a month) are more than twice as likely as those who didn’t grow up attending services regularly to say they now attend religious services at least monthly.

Table showing Americans raised in religious families are more likely to attend religious services as adults

And among all respondents who were raised in a religion (i.e., among those raised Protestant, Catholic, Jewish, Muslim, or as adherents of another religious tradition), those who were raised in highly religious homes are much more likely to have retained their childhood religious identity.

Indeed, 74% of people who were raised in a religion and grew up attending weekly religious services in a family in which religion was very important still identify with their childhood religion today; 15% of respondents who grew up in this kind of environment now say they have no religion, and 10% identify with a religion different from the one in which they were raised. (Refer to the section on religious switching for details about retaining or leaving one’s childhood religion in adulthood.)

By contrast, among people who were raised in a religion but grew up seldom or never attending religious services – and in a family in which religion was not too important or not at all important – fewer than half still identify with their childhood religion. Instead, most now say they have no religion (40%) or identify with a religion different from the one in which they were raised (16%).

Table showing Americans raised in religiously observant families are more likely to retain their religious identity in adulthood

In short, for many people, a religious upbringing leads to a religious adulthood.15 But the survey also indicates that raising children in a religious environment is no guarantee that those children will grow up to be religious as adults.

Indeed, 40% of U.S. adults say they attend religious services less often today than they did as children. Just 5% say they attend religious services more often today than they did as kids.

Table showing 40% of U.S. adults say they attend religious services less often than they did as children

And 32% of U.S. adults say religion is less important to them today than it was to their families when they were growing up. By contrast, 18% say religion is more important to them today than it was to their families when they were children.

Compared with their elders, today’s youngest adults are less likely, by a variety of measures, to say they had a religious upbringing. For example, more than nine-in-ten adults ages 74 and older say they were raised in a religion, including 89% who were raised Christian. Among U.S. adults who were roughly between 18 and 24 when the survey was conducted, 75% were raised in a religion, including 67% who were raised Christian.

Two-thirds of the oldest Americans say they grew up going to religious services at least once a week. Only about half of the youngest adults say the same.

And while half of the oldest adults say that as children they received a lot of formal religious education (i.e., seven or more years), just 19% of today’s youngest adults say the same. People in the youngest age group are about twice as likely as those in the oldest age group to say they received no formal religious education at all (42% vs. 20%).

There is one exception to this pattern: Young adults are not less likely than older Americans to say religion was very important to their families when they were children. Among adults who were roughly between the ages of 18 to 24 when the new survey was conducted, 47% say religion was very important to their families when they were growing up. Among adults ages 74 and older, 44% say the same.

Table showing that compared with older U.S. adults, fewer young people say they were raised in religious households or received a lot of formal religious education

Moreover, the persistence of a high level of religiousness from childhood into adulthood – the “stickiness” of a religious upbringing – appears to be declining, while the stickiness of a nonreligious upbringing seems to be increasing.

In the oldest cohort of U.S. adults (ages 74 and older), 51% of those who say they grew up attending religious services weekly in families for whom religion was very important are still highly religious in these ways (i.e., they still go to services weekly and still say religion is very important in their lives).

Table showing how ‘sticky’ is a religious upbringing? It seems to be less sticky among young adults than older Americans

And among people in this oldest cohort, 50% of those who say they grew up seldom or never attending religious services in families in which religion was not too important or not at all important still describe themselves as nonreligious in these ways (i.e., they still rarely or never go to services, and still say religion is not important in their lives).

In other words, a highly religious upbringing has proved to be just as “sticky” as a nonreligious upbringing over the lifetimes of the oldest Americans (now 74 and older).

By contrast, among the youngest U.S. adults in the survey (now ages 18 to 24), just 28% of those raised in highly religious homes are, today, highly religious themselves. Meanwhile, 76% of young adults who grew up rarely or never attending services, in families in which religion was unimportant, still say they don’t attend religious services and that religion is not important to them. In other words, a highly religious upbringing has been much less persistent (or “sticky”) than a nonreligious upbringing so far in the lifetimes of the youngest U.S. adults.

Of course, it’s possible that the effect of a highly religious upbringing just needs time to develop. Maybe the people in the youngest cohort will grow more religious as they age, and if they are surveyed again in 20 or 30 years, a highly religious upbringing will appear stickier than it does now. However, there is no evidence in the three Religious Landscape Studies conducted since 2007 that any birth cohorts have grown more religious over the long term, as discussed below in the section on how religious beliefs change as people age.

For more information on Americans’ religious upbringing, refer to Chapter 4.

Religion in U.S. families today

Raising children

Among parents of minor children – i.e., people currently raising children under 18 in their homes – 40% say they send their child or children to some kind of religious education or private religious school.

By comparison, 51% of parents say they, themselves, received a fair amount or a lot of religious education as children, while 16% received a little, and 33% had none.

However, these questions about the respondent’s own religious education and the religious education of their kids are not exactly parallel. The survey asked respondents to report how many years of religious education they received as children, whereas parents were asked whether their minor children are currently enrolled in a religious private school or other religious education programs. Some parents may not have children enrolled right now but may enroll them later or may have enrolled them in the past.

Among parents living with minor children in their homes, 42% say they read scripture or pray with their children. The survey did not ask respondents whether (or how often) they used to read scripture with their parents or prayed with their parents when they were children themselves.

Bar chart showing that today, 4 in 10 U.S. parents say they send their kids to religious education

Overall, 26% of people who are currently raising children say they go to religious services at least weekly, and an additional 9% say they go to religious services once or twice a month. The survey did not ask current parents whether they take their children with them when they go to religious services. But, even if all 35% do take their children with them to services, this still would be a much smaller percentage than the roughly two-thirds of parents who say they went to services at least monthly when they were growing up.16

Bar chart showing 26% of parents currently raising children report attending religious services at least weekly

For more on how parents in different religious traditions are raising their children, refer to Chapter 6.

Religious intermarriage

In the new survey, 26% of married adults say their spouse has a religious identity different from their own. That’s virtually identical to what we found in the 2014 RLS (25%).

One-quarter of married Catholics in the new survey say they are married to a non-Catholic spouse, including 14% who are married to a spouse from another Christian tradition and 9% who are married to a spouse with no religion.

About one-in-five married Protestants say they have a non-Protestant spouse, including 8% who have a spouse who identifies with another Christian faith and 10% whose spouse has no religion.

Roughly one-third of married “nones” say their spouse identifies with some religion, in most cases a branch of Christianity.

Table showing 19% of married Protestants have a non-Protestant spouse, and 25% of married Catholics have a non-Catholic spouse

Protestants, Catholics and Jews who are in religiously mixed marriages are far less religiously active, on average, than those with spouses who share their religion.

For example, 68% of Protestants married to other Protestants say religion is very important in their lives, compared with 38% of Protestants married to non-Protestants who say this. And 49% of Catholics married to fellow Catholics say they go to church at least once or twice a month, compared with 28% of Catholics married to non-Catholics who say they attend this often.

These differences carry over into child-rearing. Among parents of minor children, Protestants married to fellow Protestants are significantly more likely than Protestants married to non-Protestants to say they pray or read scripture with their kids and send their children to religious education. For the most part, a similar pattern holds for Catholics.

These patterns raise an interesting question: Does being in a religiously mixed marriage make people less religious, or are nonreligious people more likely to enter religiously mixed marriages? The survey cannot answer this question; it’s possible that both things are at play.

Meanwhile, religiously unaffiliated people married to spouses who identify with a religion tend to be a little more religiously active, on average, than religiously unaffiliated people married to spouses who are also unaffiliated.

For instance, 12% of married “nones” whose spouses identify with a religion say they pray daily, compared with 9% of married “nones” who have a fellow “none” as a spouse. And 13% of religious “nones” who are currently parenting a minor child and who are married to a religiously affiliated spouse say they send at least one of their children to religious education, compared with 5% of religious “nones” who are married to a religiously unaffiliated spouse.17 The differences are quite small, though, as are the overall shares of “nones” who say they are religiously active in these ways – regardless of whether they are married to a fellow “none,” or not.

For more on religious intermarriage, refer to Chapter 4.

Table showing Protestants, Catholics in religiously mixed marriages tend to be less religious

Religious switching

Overall, 35% of U.S. adults have switched religions between childhood and adulthood. That is, they say they currently identify with a religion (or with no religion) that is different from the religion in which they were raised.

Table showing 22% of U.S. adults were raised as Christians but no longer identify as such

This figure includes people who switched from one Christian religious tradition to another (e.g., those who say they were raised Protestant but now identify as Catholic or vice versa), as well as people who switched from one non-Christian religion to another (e.g., those who say they were raised Hindu and now identify as Buddhist or vice versa).18 It also includes people who switch from identifying with a religion to describing themselves as religiously unaffiliated (or vice versa).

The share of people in the new survey who say they switched religions is on par with the share who said this in 2014.

When we divide the data into just three categories – Christianity, other religions and no religion – it shows very clearly that Christianity loses far more people than it gains through religious switching. Fully 80% of U.S. adults say they were raised Christian, but upward of a quarter of them (22% of all U.S. adults) no longer identify as Christians.

What is ‘religious switching’?

We use the phrase “religious switching” rather than more familiar terms like “conversion” because changes in religious identity occur in all directions, including from having a religion to having no religion. Also, these changes can take place without any formal ritual or declaration.

We measure religious switching with two survey questions. The first asks, “What is your present religion, if any?” The second asks, “Thinking about when you were a child, in what religion were you raised, if any?” By comparing each respondent’s answers to these questions, we can see whether they still have the same religion in which they were raised or whether they have switched.

However, these questions may not capture all the switching that takes place. For instance, they would not reveal whether a person has switched multiple times, or whether a person left their childhood religion and later returned to it. Our analysis of religious switching focuses on the difference (if any) between a respondent’s religious identity at the time of the survey and during childhood, not the steps that may have occurred in between.

By contrast, religious “nones” gain far more people than they lose through religious switching. Overall, 13% of U.S. adults say they were raised in no religion. But fully 20% of U.S. adults now say they are religiously unaffiliated after having been raised in a religion, including 19% who were raised Christian and 1% who were raised in other religions.

Expressed as a ratio, these figures mean that there are six former Christians for every convert to Christianity in the United States. The balance is especially lopsided for Catholicism (which loses 8.4 people through religious switching for every convert to the religion). But Protestants also lose more people than they gain through switching, by a ratio of 1.8 to one.

Chart showing that on balance, Christians lose more people than they gain by religious switching; ‘nones’ gain far more than they lose

In stark contrast, the religiously unaffiliated gain nearly six people for every person they lose through religious switching. That is, there are about six times as many Americans who say they were raised in a religion and no longer identify with a religion than there are who say they were raised in no religion but now identify with one.

In the aggregate, religions other than Christianity gain about as many people as they lose through religious switching. Overall, 3% of the public identifies with a religion other than Christianity after having been raised Christian or with no religion (or they did not answer the question about their childhood religion). And 2% of U.S. adults say they were raised in a religion other than Christianity but no longer identify with it.

The survey shows big differences in religious switching patterns across age groups, which helps explain the long-term declines in religious affiliation, especially for Christianity. Vast majorities of older adults (89% of those born in the 1950s or earlier) say they were raised Christian, and most of them are still Christian today. Relatively few older adults say either that they were raised in no religion or that they have become religiously unaffiliated after having been raised as Christians.

Smaller majorities of young adults were raised as Christians, and fewer of them have retained their Christian identity in adulthood. Young people are more likely than older adults to have been raised in no religion and, also, more likely to have become religiously unaffiliated after having been raised as Christians.

Interestingly, among the youngest adults – those born between 2000 and 2006, who were ages 18 to 24 when the survey was conducted – the share who were raised Christian and are still Christian is about as high as among those born in the 1990s, who were 24 to 34 when the survey was conducted (41% vs. 42%). And the youngest cohort is slightly less likely than the second-youngest cohort to have left Christianity.

Jump to Chapter 2 to see the retention rates of different religious groups (i.e., what percentage of all the people raised in each group still identify with that group today).

Table showing younger adults are more likely than older Americans to have left Christianity

Signs of strengthening spirituality

When asked how their levels of spirituality may have changed over the course of their lifetimes, Americans who say they have become more spiritual outnumber those who say they have become less spiritual by a roughly four-to-one margin (43% vs. 11%).

Bar chart showing more Americans say their spirituality has increased than decreased over the course of their lives

Moreover, the survey finds that Americans of all ages are more likely to say their spirituality has grown stronger than to say it has weakened.19

Large majorities of the U.S. public believe that people have a soul or spirit in addition to their physical bodies, that there is something spiritual beyond the natural world, and that there is an afterlife.

And although younger Americans are less traditionally religious than older adults (as measured by rates of prayer, identifying with a religious group, attending religious services, and some other beliefs and practices), the age gaps are much smaller on several of the survey’s questions about spirituality.20

For instance, 82% of adults who were roughly between the ages of 18 and 24 when the survey was conducted say they believe people have a soul or spirit in addition to their physical body – only slightly lower than the share of today’s oldest adults who affirm the same belief.

Bar chart showing the relatively modest age gaps among Americans on some questions about spirituality

And 63% of today’s youngest adults say they feel a deep sense of wonder about the universe at least monthly, which is somewhat higher than the share of today’s oldest adults who say the same.

The survey finds that Americans who say their spirituality has increased are more likely than other adults (especially those who say their spirituality has declined) to say they regularly feel awe at nature’s beauty, feel a sense of spiritual peace, and experience the presence of something from beyond this world.

Americans who say their spirituality has grown also are more inclined than others to say they believe in God or a universal spirit, and to say they pray daily.

Table showing Americans who say they’ve become more spiritual stand out on a variety of spirituality, religion measures

These results suggest that spirituality and religion are not necessarily in tension with each other. We know from previous research that many people view spirituality and religion as complementary; some see no difference between them.

Bar chart showing religiously affiliated Americans are more apt than ‘nones’ to say they’ve grown more spiritual over their lives

Indeed, the new survey finds that people who identify with a religion are more likely than religiously unaffiliated Americans to say they have grown increasingly spiritual during their lives.

Religiously affiliated people also are more inclined than religious “nones” to believe in God or a universal spirit, to pray daily, and to report that they experience a variety of spiritual sensations, such as “the presence of something from beyond this world.”

Among the “nones,” those who say they’ve grown more spiritual during their lives are more likely than other religiously unaffiliated people to say that people have souls or spirits in addition to their physical bodies, that there is something spiritual beyond the natural world, and that they regularly feel a sense of awe at the beauty of nature.

Table showing religious ‘nones’ who say they’ve grown more spiritual during their lives have very different beliefs and experiences than ‘nones’ who have not grown more spiritual

Attendance at religious services

The 2023-24 RLS finds a substantial age gap in attendance at religious services. Most young adults say they go to religious services no more than a few times a year. Indeed, among people born since the 1980s, about half or more say they seldom or never attend religious services.

Table showing three-quarters of U.S. adults born since 1980s say they attend religious services a few times a year or less, if at all

By comparison, older adults report attending religious services at far higher rates. Furthermore, 57% of people in the oldest cohort say they are members of a religious congregation, compared with 27% of the youngest adults.

Does this mean that attendance at religious services is declining? Not necessarily. The age gap, by itself, is not proof that fewer people are attending services, because it is theoretically possible that people participate in religious services at higher rates as they get older. Perhaps today’s young adults will go to a church, synagogue, mosque or other house of worship more often when they reach middle age or retirement age than they do today.

Moreover, we do not have a clear, long-term trend line for attendance at religious services because the new survey’s findings about rates of religious attendance cannot be directly compared with the previous landscape studies.

The earlier studies in 2007 and 2014 were conducted by telephone, while the new survey was conducted mainly online or on paper. Previous research shows that these different ways (or “modes”) of conducting surveys produce significantly different results on the question “How often do you attend religious services?” This makes it hard to determine, over the long term, how much religious attendance has changed.

However, the Center’s telephone surveys were showing a decline in religious attendance in the years before we switched to online/paper surveys. The share of Americans who reported attending religious services at least monthly dropped from 54% in 2007 to 50% in the 2014 Religious Landscape Study and had fallen to 45% by 2018-19 (which is when the Center last regularly conducted telephone surveys that asked about religious attendance).

But the short-term trend line for the share of Americans who attend religious services at least monthly is pretty flat. In Pew Research Center’s 2020 NPORS, 33% of U.S. adults reported attending religious services at least once or twice a month. That’s identical to what we found in the 2023-24 RLS and very similar to the 32% measured in the 2024 NPORS.

Table showing the short-term trend in the share of U.S. adults who say they attend religious services at least monthly

How religious beliefs change as people age

When asked to describe how their own religiousness has changed over their lifetimes, the most common response people give is that there has been no clear change in either direction – up or down – over the course of their lives (44% of U.S. adults say this). This includes people who say they have sometimes grown more religious and other times less religious; people who say their level of religiousness has not changed very much; and people who don’t answer the question. This is the most common kind of response among respondents in every age category.

Bar chart showing more young U.S. adults say their religiousness has decreased than say it has increased

Among people who say their religiousness has changed over the course of their lives, about equal shares say they have become less religious (29%) and more religious (28%).

The new RLS also finds that more young adults say their religiousness has decreased than say it has increased. By contrast, older U.S. adults are more likely to say their religiousness has increased than that it has decreased.21

However, on the questions in the new survey that can be directly compared with the previous studies, there is no evidence that people in older birth cohorts have grown more religious between 2007 and today.

In the three Religious Landscape Studies conducted over the past 17 years, there are no birth cohorts – neither the oldest Americans, nor the youngest, nor any cohort in between – that have grown more prayerful, more certain in their belief in God, more likely to believe in an afterlife (heaven, hell or both), or more likely to identify with a religion, including Christianity.

Table showing that between 2007 and 2023-24, there is no evidence in Religious Landscape Studies that Americans are becoming more religious as they get older

This may seem at odds with the retrospective answers that survey respondents give to questions about how their own religiousness and spirituality have changed. As previously noted, about four times as many U.S. adults say they have become more spiritual (43%) as say they have become less spiritual (11%) over their lifetimes, while nearly equal shares say they have become more religious (28%) and less religious (29%).

But substantial numbers of Americans say they haven’t really changed spiritually (46%) or religiously (44%). And the answers people give to these questions may be shaped by many factors, such as how desirable they feel it is to be spiritual and/or religious, and how they understand the meaning of those terms.

Another limitation in understanding how religiousness tends to change as people age is that Pew Research Center’s data on many questions about religion goes back no further than the first Religious Landscape Study in 2007. That 17-year span may not be long enough to capture all the change that has occurred in older birth cohorts. For a longer perspective, we turned to the General Social Survey (GSS), a national survey that has been conducted every year or two since 1972.

The GSS shows that people do tend to become more prayerful as they get older. For example, when people born in the 1960s were just entering adulthood in the early 1980s, 36% said in the GSS that they prayed on a daily basis. By the late 2010s, when people in this birth cohort were in their late 40s and 50s, 64% said they prayed daily. The GSS also reports that people born in the 1950s and 1970s exhibited similar long-term increases in rates of daily prayer.

But the GSS suggests that people do not become more likely to identify with a religion as they get older. There is also little evidence in the GSS that as Americans get older, they tend to become more likely to believe in God or to attend religious services regularly.

For more analysis of GSS data on how the religiousness of people in different birth cohorts has changed or stayed the same over time, refer to Appendix C.22

What is happening to the ‘middle’ of American religion

As the Christian share of the U.S. adult population has declined in recent decades and the public has come to look less religious on a variety of measures, the question arises whether these changes are evidence of religious decline across the board or, instead, a hollowing out of the “religious middle.”

That is, are religious beliefs and practices declining all across the religious spectrum? Or is there a decline only in the share of the population with medium levels of religiousness, accompanied by stability or even growth at both ends of the spectrum of religiousness – resulting in more highly secular people, more highly religious people, and fewer people who are just moderately religious?

The new RLS indicates that the long-term changes in American religion are broad-based and not a hollowing out of the religious middle.

Perhaps the easiest way to illustrate this is by looking at trends in prayer frequency over time. This is the new study’s best indicator of religiousness that can safely and directly be compared with previous RLS results.23 The share of Americans who say they pray daily is clearly down. And the share of Americans who say they seldom or never pray is clearly up. Meanwhile, the share of Americans who say they occasionally pray (on a weekly or monthly basis) is relatively stable. There is no indication of a hollowing out of the “religious middle” on this key indicator.

Bar chart showing the U.S. has seen growth at the low end of the religiousness spectrum and a decline at the high end

The survey finds a similar pattern in questions about belief in God. The share of Americans who say they believe in God or a universal spirit with absolute certainty has clearly declined, while nonbelief is trending upward. And the share of Americans occupying the middle ground on this question – saying they believe in God but with less than absolute certainty – shows no signs of hollowing out, but rather is rising. The share of adults in the new survey who believe in God but with less than absolute certainty is higher than it has ever been in an RLS survey.24

Another way to assess the evidence for a hollowing out of the religious middle is to look at differences across age groups within the new survey. This allows us to examine additional indicators of religiousness, because looking just at the results of the new survey sidesteps the difficulties posed by the change of survey modes between the previous two Religious Landscape Studies (conducted by telephone) and the new one (conducted mainly online and on paper).

For this analysis, we used four key questions: prayer frequency, belief in God and/or a universal spirit, religion’s importance, and religious service attendance. Responses to each question were assigned numbers from 0 (low) to 2 (high) as follows:

  • Prayer frequency: Coded as 0 for those who seldom or never pray, 2 for those who pray daily, and 1 for everyone else.
  • Belief in God or a universal spirit: Coded as 0 for those who do not believe in God or a universal spirit, 2 for those who believe with absolute certainty, and 1 for everyone else.
  • Religion’s importance: Coded as 0 for those who say religion is not too important or not at all important in their lives, 2 for those who say religion is very important in their lives, and 1 for everyone else.
  • Religious attendance: Coded as 0 for those who say they seldom or never attend religious services, 2 for those who attend religious services at least once a month, and 1 for everyone else.

We then added these indicators together to form a scale ranging from 0 (for people who scored 0 on all four measures) to 8 (for respondents who scored 2 on all four measures).25 And we subdivided the scale roughly into quartiles, as follows:

  • Low religiousness: Scores of 0 to 1
  • Medium-low religiousness: Scores of 2 to 4
  • Medium-high religiousness: Scores of 5 to 6
  • High religiousness: Scores of 7 to 8

Here again, there is no evidence that religious changes underway in America reflect a shrinking of the “religious middle.” The religious middle is not smaller among the younger cohorts than among the older cohorts, which is what one might expect if a hollowing out of the religious middle were occurring.

Chart showing young adults are less religious than older adults; ‘religious middle’ makes up between 45% and 49% of most age categories

Rather, compared with older adults, younger Americans include far more people at the low end of the religiousness spectrum and far fewer people at the high end. The size of the middle categories of religiousness is in the same ballpark across most age groups. This is exactly the pattern that would be expected if broad-based religious decline (which some social scientists call a process of secularization) were underway.

We have already seen that over the long term (since 2007), the Religious Landscape Studies show a substantial rise in the percentage of U.S. adults who are religiously unaffiliated (sometimes called “nones”) and a substantial decline in the percentage who describe themselves as Christians – including declines in all three major Protestant traditions (evangelical, mainline and historically Black Protestant churches).

This raises the question: As the Christian share of the population has shrunk, have Christians become more religious, on average? One might expect that as some Americans leave Christianity and join the ranks of the unaffiliated, those who stay behind and remain Christian would become a smaller but more committed group, with rising average levels of religious belief and practice. Has this happened?

The new RLS offers a mixed answer, with a couple of indicators of religiousness holding steady or rising slightly among U.S. Christians, while two other indicators clearly have declined.

The four questions in the 2023-24 RLS about religious practice and belief that can most readily be compared with the prior studies ask about prayer frequency, belief in God or a universal spirit, belief in heaven and, separately, belief in hell.26

The new survey shows that among Christians, belief in heaven and hell is on par with or slightly higher than in 2007. Belief in heaven now stands at 85% among Christians, compared with 83% in 2007. Meanwhile, 72% of Christians now say they believe in hell, up slightly from 68% in 2007.

But there is no indication that Christians are any more prayerful today than they were in 2007. Indeed, the share of Christians who say they pray every day is markedly lower now (44%) than it was in 2007 (58%).

The share of Christians who say they believe in God with absolute certainty also is lower today than it was in 2007. In the new survey, 73% of Christians say they are absolutely certain God or a universal spirit exists, down from 80% in 2007.

Table showing that among U.S. Christians, belief in heaven and hell has been steady or rising, while rates of daily prayer and absolutely certain belief in God have been declining

Religion and political polarization

The U.S. is politically polarized, and religion is closely associated with the country’s political divisions. But the new Religious Landscape Study – which was conducted mostly in 2023 and the early part of 2024, before the 2024 presidential election – also finds that the connections between religion and political partisanship vary a lot by race and ethnicity, as described below.

In general, highly religious Americans tend to identify with or lean toward the Republican Party and express conservative views on a variety of social, political and economic questions at much higher rates than do the least religious Americans. Meanwhile, Americans with lower levels of religious engagement tend to identify with or lean toward the Democratic Party and express liberal views on the same gamut of social, political and economic issues.27

For example, a majority of people in the most highly religious quartile of the U.S. adult population (61%) say they identify with or lean toward the Republican Party. By contrast, in the least religious quartile of the population, just 27% say they identify with or lean toward the GOP.28

Highly religious U.S. adults also are far more likely than the least religious U.S. adults to say that abortion should be illegal, that homosexuality should be discouraged, and that children are better off if their mother doesn’t work and stays home to raise them instead.

There also are religious differences on questions that aren’t directly about sexuality or gender roles. Highly religious people are more inclined than the least religious people to say that environmental regulations cost too many jobs and hurt the economy, as well as to say that too much openness to people from other countries is a threat to America’s identity.

None of the foregoing discussion is meant to suggest that religiousness (or lack thereof) is the primary factor driving Americans’ political opinions. Numerous other factors can help shape political views, including age, gender, education, geography and socioeconomic status. And political partisanship is itself an important factor in people’s views about a host of issues.29

Table showing the most highly religious Americans also are the most Republican, conservative

Moreover, the new RLS shows that the links between religion and politics vary quite a bit across racial and ethnic categories. The political differences between Americans with different levels of religiousness are especially large among White respondents. For example, compared with the least religious White Americans, the most highly religious White Americans are:

  • 64 percentage points more likely to say abortion should be against the law in most or all cases (72% vs. 8%)
  • 53 points more likely to say homosexuality should be discouraged by society (61% vs. 8%)
  • 49 points more likely to identify with or lean toward the Republican Party (77% vs. 28%)
  • 35 points more likely to say environmental regulations cost too many jobs and hurt the economy (56% vs. 21%)

In other racial and ethnic groups, there also is a relationship between religiousness and political views, with more highly religious people generally expressing more conservative views. However, the differences in political views between people with different levels of religiousness tend to be smaller in other racial and ethnic groups, and they are not seen on every issue.

For example, Black respondents who are highly religious are not more likely than the least religious Black respondents to identify with or lean toward the Republican Party; if anything, highly religious Black adults are somewhat less Republican than Black adults with the lowest levels of religious engagement.

Highly religious Hispanic respondents are, on average, more likely than the least religious Hispanics surveyed to identify with the Republican Party. But the gap in Republicanism among highly religious Hispanic adults and Hispanic adults in the lowest religiousness category is 22 points, much smaller than the 49-point gap among White adults.

Table showing that especially among White Americans, more religious people tend to take more conservative positions
  1. Compared with older people, younger adults are less likely to say they were raised in a religion, less likely to say they grew up going to religious services at least monthly, and less likely to have received a lot of formal religious education as children. Young adults also are somewhat less likely than older people to say religion was “very important” to them personally when they were children, and more likely to say religion was “not too important” or “not at all important” to them personally when they were children. An exception to this pattern is that there is little difference across age categories in the share of people who say religion was “very important” to their families when they were kids.
  2. For more on generational changes in American religion, read Hout, Michael, and Claude S. Fischer. 2014. “Explaining Why More Americans Have No Religious Preference: Political Backlash and Generational Succession, 1987-2012.” Sociological Science. Also refer to Voas, David, and Mark Chaves. 2016. “Is the United States a Counterexample to the Secularization Thesis?” American Journal of Sociology.
  3. This is not the first time surveys have found young people entering adulthood with levels of religiousness roughly equal to those of the preceding birth cohort. The 2014 Religious Landscape Study (RLS) also found that the youngest adults (at the time) were about as likely as their immediate predecessors to identify as Christians and to report attending religious services weekly. One possible explanation could be that the youngest cohort of new adults includes many who still live at home with parents or guardians. As they gradually form independent households, their levels of religious engagement may change.
  4. On some other questions, however, adults born in 2000 or later exhibit lower levels of religiousness than those born in the 1990s. For instance, they are somewhat less likely to say they pray every day, to believe in God with absolute certainty, and to have received a lot of religious education as children.
  5. Some social scientists have long argued that younger, more liberal Americans are leaving religion in a backlash against the entanglement of religious institutions and leaders with conservative politics. Read Hout, Michael, and Claude S. Fischer. 2002. “Why More Americans Have No Religious Preference: Politics and Generations.” American Sociological Review. Also refer to Putnam, Robert D. and David E. Campbell. 2010. “American Grace: How Religion Divides and Unites Us.”
  6. Of course, this correlation doesn’t mean that changes in one attribute (political ideology) cause changes in the other (religious identity). It’s also possible that people in various religious categories have changed their ideological outlook over time. For more on the complex relationship between people’s religious characteristics and political attributes, refer to Campbell, David E., Geoffrey C. Layman and John C. Green. 2020. “Secular Surge: A New Fault Line in American Politics.” Also refer to Margolis, Michele. 2018. “From Politics to the Pews: How Partisanship and the Political Environment Shape Religious Identity.” Also refer to Margolis, Michele. 2022. “Reversing the Causal Arrow: Politics’ Influence on Religious Choices.” Advances in Political Psychology.
  7. Tracking partisanship over time is complicated by a “mode effect.” Compared with surveys conducted by telephone (like the 2007 and 2014 landscape studies), surveys conducted mainly online and on paper (like the 2023-24 RLS) produce far lower estimates of the shares of adults who don’t identify with or lean toward either major party, as well as higher estimates of the shares who identify with or lean toward one or the other of the two major U.S. political parties. The RLS does not adjust for this effect, and therefore, we are not able to analyze trends in partisanship across the three landscape studies. However, the Center’s April 2024 report “Changing Partisan Coalitions in a Politically Divided Nation” does make this adjustment, and it provides estimates of how the religious composition of the partisan coalitions has changed over time. The mode switch from phone to web/paper also complicates comparing results on a question about political ideology (conservative/moderate/liberal) in the new survey with previous surveys. But the impact of the mode switch is less pronounced on the question about ideology than on the questions about partisanship. For more details about the consequences of the mode switch for drawing comparisons across the three Religious Landscape Studies, refer to Appendix A.
  8. In the Religious Landscape Studies, respondents are categorized as nondenominational Protestants only if they identify themselves explicitly as a “nondenominational Protestant” or a “nondenominational Christian.” The “Nondenominational Protestant” category does not include respondents who identify themselves as “just Christian” or “just a Protestant.” Nor does it include people who identify with Protestantism but not with any particular denomination; these latter types of responses are included in the “Nonspecific Protestant” category.
  9. Churches of Christ describes itself as “undenominational,” and the organization has “no central headquarters” and “no organization superior to the elders of each local congregation.” Visit the organization’s website for additional details.
  10. In the new RLS, fewer than 0.3% of respondents identify with the Global Methodist Church, which we categorize as an evangelical denomination.
  11. The “Unitarians and other liberal faiths” category includes U.S. adults who describe themselves as Unitarians, “spiritual but not religious,” deists, humanists and others. The “New Age” category includes those who identify as Pagans, Wiccans, druids, Satanists and others.
  12. Overall, 18% of respondents in the new survey were born outside the United States.
  13. Refer also to the Center’s report “Religion Among Asian Americans.”
  14. For more information on gender differences in religious identities, beliefs and practices both in the U.S. and around the world, refer to Pew Research Center’s report “The Gender Gap in Religion Around the World.”
  15. The reverse also is true: Religious adults are more likely to give their children a religious upbringing, as described in Chapter 6.
  16. The survey finds that, in general, parents who are raising minor children attend religious services at higher rates than adults of a similar age who are not parents. For instance, among parents between the ages of 25 and 34, 34% say they attend religious services at least monthly, compared with 20% of people in the same age group who are not parents. Among parents between the ages of 35 and 44, 34% say they attend religious services at least monthly, compared with 18% of people in the same age group who are not currently parenting a minor child. One exception to this pattern is the youngest age group: Among Americans ages 18 to 24, those who are parents do not report attending services at higher rates than those who are not parents. But the survey includes a relatively small number of interviews with 18- to 24-year-olds who are parents, and the results for this group have a correspondingly large margin of error (plus or minus 8.8 percentage points).
  17. Relatively few religious “nones” married to a religiously affiliated spouse say their spouse is very religious. Overall, 17% of religious “nones” married to a religiously affiliated spouse say religion is very important in their spouse’s life, 36% say religion is somewhat important to their spouse, and 47% say religion is not too important or not at all important to their spouse.
  18. This figure does not include switching within Protestantism (e.g., from Baptist to Methodist, or from Lutheran to Episcopalian), nor does it include switching within the religiously unaffiliated category (e.g., from atheist to agnostic, or from agnostic to “nothing in particular”). If these kinds of switching within Protestantism and among the religiously unaffiliated are added to the equation, then the share of U.S. adults who have switched religions between childhood and adulthood rises to 49%.
  19. Young adults and older Americans may have very different reference points in mind when answering this question. Young adults have only their childhood and early adulthood as points of comparison. Older adults may be considering a much longer time horizon.
  20. There is an active debate among scholars over how to define religion and spirituality. Previous Pew Research Center surveys have shown that many Americans see no real difference between the two terms. However, some people describe themselves as spiritual but not religious, and our surveys find that many of these people hold supernatural beliefs (such as in a higher power or spiritual force in the universe) but rarely participate in organized religious activities, such as attending religious services. With that finding in mind, we use “spirituality” loosely in this report to refer to beliefs or practices that don’t necessarily imply participation in, or identification with, any organized religion. At the same time, we do not wish to suggest that there is a clear line between religion and spirituality.
  21. Of course, young adults and older Americans may have very different reference points when asked this question about the course of their lives. Young adults have only their childhood and young adulthood as points of comparison, whereas older adults have a much longer time horizon.
  22. For more on religious change over the course of adulthood, refer to Bengtson, Vern L., et al. 2015. “Does Religiousness Increase with Age? Age Changes and Generational Differences Over 35 Years.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion. Also refer to Silverstein, Merril, and Vern L. Bengtson. 2017. “Return to Religion? Predictors of Religious Change among Baby-Boomers in their Transition to Later Life.” Journal of Population Ageing. Also refer to Bleidorn, Wiebke, et al. 2022. “Secularization Trends Obscure Developmental Changes in Religiosity.” Social Psychological and Personality Science.
  23. The switch from telephone interviewing in the earlier landscape studies to mostly online/paper administration of the new RLS means that other key questions, such as frequency of religious attendance and the importance of religion, are not directly comparable across the different studies. Refer to Appendix A for details.
  24.  The 2023-24 RLS was conducted mainly online and on paper, whereas the previous landscape studies were conducted by telephone. This “mode switch” complicates comparisons between results from the new survey and the previous studies. However, our analysis finds that the new survey’s question about prayer frequency can be safely compared with the prior studies. The questions about belief in God can be cautiously compared with the previous results. Analysis of a companion “bridge study” we conducted by telephone (for testing purposes only) finds that the share who say they believe in God or a universal spirit with absolute certainty is similar in the main survey and in the bridge study, as is the share who say they believe in God or a universal spirit but are not absolutely certain. These categories can be safely compared with the 2007 and 2014 results. However, the share who say they do not believe in God/a universal spirit is higher in the main survey than the bridge study (by 4 percentage points), while the share expressing no opinion is slightly lower in the main survey than in the bridge study. Both the main survey and the bridge study find that absolutely certain belief in God or a universal spirit is trending downward. Both the main survey and the bridge study also suggest that the share of people who do not believe in God or a universal spirit is trending upward, though it is difficult to say by exactly how much; some of the apparent increase in nonbelief suggested by the main survey may be attributable to the switch in survey modes. Neither the main survey nor the bridge study suggests that the middle category – those who believe in God or a universal spirit, but not with absolute certainty – is shrinking. For additional details, refer to Appendix A.
  25. Cronbach’s Alpha=.865.
  26. The 2023-24 RLS was conducted mainly online and on paper, whereas the previous landscape studies were conducted by telephone. This “mode switch” complicates comparisons between results from the new survey and the previous studies. However, our analysis finds that these estimates from 2023-24 can be safely compared with the prior studies. For additional details, refer to Appendix A.
  27. For a discussion of political differences between Americans who are affirmatively secular and those who are instead simply nonreligious, refer to Campbell, David E., Geoffrey C. Layman and John C. Green. 2020. “Secular Surge: A New Fault Line in American Politics.”
  28. The scale of religiousness is based on four questions: prayer frequency, belief in God and/or a universal spirit, religion’s importance, and religious service attendance. Each question was coded from 0 (low) to 2 (high). Prayer frequency is coded as 0 for those who seldom or never pray, 2 for those who pray daily, and 1 for everyone else. Belief in God/a universal spirit is coded as 0 for those who do not believe in God or a universal spirit, 2 for those who believe with absolute certainty, and 1 for everyone else. Religion’s importance is coded as 0 for those who say religion is “not too important” or “not at all important” in their lives, 2 for those who say religion is “very important” in their lives, and 1 for everyone else. Religious attendance is coded as 0 for those who say they seldom or never attend religious services, 2 for those who attend religious services at least once a month, and 1 for everyone else. These indicators were added together to form a scale ranging from 0 to 8, and then subdivided roughly into quartiles (scores of 0 to 1 in the lowest quartile, scores of 2 to 4 in the medium-low quartile, scores of 5 to 6 in the medium-high quartile, and scores of 7 to 8 in the highest quartile).
  29. For a discussion of demographics and political polarization, refer to Pew Research Center’s report “Changing Partisan Coalitions in a Politically Divided Nation.” For a discussion of how people in the two major party coalitions see each other, refer to the Center’s report “As Partisan Hostility Grows, Signs of Frustration With the Two-Party System.” For a discussion of issue attitudes, political values and polarization, refer to the Center’s report “The Political Values of Harris and Trump Supporters.”
Icon for promotion number 1

Sign up for our weekly newsletter

Fresh data delivery Saturday mornings

Icon for promotion number 1

Sign up for The Briefing

Weekly updates on the world of news & information